Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming

Fumiya Kato; Kazunori Sakamoto; Hironori Washizaki; Yoshiaki Fukazawa

Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming

Fumiya Kato, Kazunori Sakamoto, Hironori Washizaki, Yoshiaki Fukazawa

研究成果: Conference contribution

抄録

There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

本文言語	English
ホスト出版物のタイトル	Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE
出版社	Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School
ページ	594-599
ページ数	6
巻	2013-January
版	January
出版ステータス	Published - 2013
イベント	25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013 - Boston, United States 継続期間: 2013 6月 27 → 2013 6月 29

Other

Other	25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013
国/地域	United States
City	Boston
Period	13/6/27 → 13/6/29

ASJC Scopus subject areas

ソフトウェア

他のファイルとリンク

フィンガープリント

「Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル

Kato, F., Sakamoto, K., Washizaki, H., & Fukazawa, Y. (2013). Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE (January ed., Vol. 2013-January, pp. 594-599). Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School.

Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms : Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. / Kato, Fumiya; Sakamoto, Kazunori; Washizaki, Hironori その他.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. Vol. 2013-January January. ed. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, 2013. p. 594-599.

研究成果: Conference contribution

Kato, F, Sakamoto, K, Washizaki, H & Fukazawa, Y 2013, Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. January edn, vol. 2013-January, Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, pp. 594-599, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013, Boston, United States, 13/6/27.

Kato F, Sakamoto K, Washizaki H , Fukazawa Y. Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. January ed. Vol. 2013-January. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School. 2013. p. 594-599

Kato, Fumiya ; Sakamoto, Kazunori ; Washizaki, Hironori その他. / Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms : Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. Vol. 2013-January January. ed. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, 2013. pp. 594-599

@inproceedings{bd151966165e414ab06999015b24842f,

title = "Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming",

abstract = "There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.",

author = "Fumiya Kato and Kazunori Sakamoto and Hironori Washizaki and Yoshiaki Fukazawa",

year = "2013",

language = "English",

volume = "2013-January",

pages = "594--599",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE",

publisher = "Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School",

edition = "January",

note = "25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013 ; Conference date: 27-06-2013 Through 29-06-2013",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms

T2 - 25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013

AU - Kato, Fumiya

AU - Sakamoto, Kazunori

AU - Washizaki, Hironori

AU - Fukazawa, Yoshiaki

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

AB - There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937718856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937718856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84937718856

VL - 2013-January

SP - 594

EP - 599

BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE

PB - Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School

Y2 - 27 June 2013 through 29 June 2013

ER -