Consumers’ switching to disruptive technology products

The roles of comparative economic value and technology type

Apinya Kamolsook, Yuosre F. Badir, Bjoern Christian Frank

研究成果: Article

抄録

This study explores consumers’ motivations to switch to new products in the context of disruptive innovation, and investigates the role of technology differences (i.e., network externality vs. stand-alone technology). Switching from an existing technology product to a disruptive technology product (DTP) involves not only benefits but also requires major sacrifices, which are not encountered in the context of continuous innovation. To model the tradeoff between the benefits and sacrifices, this study extends the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model by introducing the construct of comparative economic value (CEV). Based on Thai consumer data, analyses support the hypothesized mediating role of CEV. CEV mediates the effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions, and partially mediates the effect of social influence on the DTP switching intent. Multi-group analysis shows that CEV depends more on effort expectancy for network externality technology and more on the performance expectancy for stand-alone technology.

元の言語English
ジャーナルTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI
出版物ステータスAccepted/In press - 2019 1 1

Fingerprint

Economics
Technology
Innovation
Comparative economics
Disruptive technology
Economic value
Expectancy
Switches
Network externalities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

これを引用

@article{2df7823d751e42bf90bdc887b84bc2d9,
title = "Consumers’ switching to disruptive technology products: The roles of comparative economic value and technology type",
abstract = "This study explores consumers’ motivations to switch to new products in the context of disruptive innovation, and investigates the role of technology differences (i.e., network externality vs. stand-alone technology). Switching from an existing technology product to a disruptive technology product (DTP) involves not only benefits but also requires major sacrifices, which are not encountered in the context of continuous innovation. To model the tradeoff between the benefits and sacrifices, this study extends the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model by introducing the construct of comparative economic value (CEV). Based on Thai consumer data, analyses support the hypothesized mediating role of CEV. CEV mediates the effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions, and partially mediates the effect of social influence on the DTP switching intent. Multi-group analysis shows that CEV depends more on effort expectancy for network externality technology and more on the performance expectancy for stand-alone technology.",
keywords = "Consumer switching intent, Discontinuous technology, Disruptive technology, Network externality, Technology adoption",
author = "Apinya Kamolsook and Badir, {Yuosre F.} and Frank, {Bjoern Christian}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.023",
language = "English",
journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumers’ switching to disruptive technology products

T2 - The roles of comparative economic value and technology type

AU - Kamolsook, Apinya

AU - Badir, Yuosre F.

AU - Frank, Bjoern Christian

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This study explores consumers’ motivations to switch to new products in the context of disruptive innovation, and investigates the role of technology differences (i.e., network externality vs. stand-alone technology). Switching from an existing technology product to a disruptive technology product (DTP) involves not only benefits but also requires major sacrifices, which are not encountered in the context of continuous innovation. To model the tradeoff between the benefits and sacrifices, this study extends the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model by introducing the construct of comparative economic value (CEV). Based on Thai consumer data, analyses support the hypothesized mediating role of CEV. CEV mediates the effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions, and partially mediates the effect of social influence on the DTP switching intent. Multi-group analysis shows that CEV depends more on effort expectancy for network externality technology and more on the performance expectancy for stand-alone technology.

AB - This study explores consumers’ motivations to switch to new products in the context of disruptive innovation, and investigates the role of technology differences (i.e., network externality vs. stand-alone technology). Switching from an existing technology product to a disruptive technology product (DTP) involves not only benefits but also requires major sacrifices, which are not encountered in the context of continuous innovation. To model the tradeoff between the benefits and sacrifices, this study extends the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model by introducing the construct of comparative economic value (CEV). Based on Thai consumer data, analyses support the hypothesized mediating role of CEV. CEV mediates the effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions, and partially mediates the effect of social influence on the DTP switching intent. Multi-group analysis shows that CEV depends more on effort expectancy for network externality technology and more on the performance expectancy for stand-alone technology.

KW - Consumer switching intent

KW - Discontinuous technology

KW - Disruptive technology

KW - Network externality

KW - Technology adoption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059352091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059352091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.023

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.023

M3 - Article

JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

SN - 0040-1625

ER -