TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential effects of phonological and lexicogrammatical errors on NS and NNS listeners' perceptions of comprehensibility
T2 - An exploratory study
AU - Saito, Kazuya
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This paper investigates how different linguistic features (i.e., phonological vs. lexicogrammatical aspects of language) affect both native speaking (NS) and non-native speaking (NNS) listeners' perceptions of comprehensibility. In the experiment, seven NS and near-native NNS listeners rated the comprehensibility of two types of NNS extemporaneous speech samples: one was carefully transcribed by the researcher and read by NSs, while the other was an unaltered collection of speech tokens recorded by NNSs. The results demonstrated two possible patterns: (a) That NNS listeners tended to show high awareness towards phonological aspects of language rather than lexicogrammatical aspects of language; and (b) the comprehensibility ratings of NS listeners were equally influenced by all kinds of linguistic errors. These findings were carefully discussed in order to inform both theoretical argument and pedagogical inquiries in practice, establishing better understanding of second language acquisition processes.
AB - This paper investigates how different linguistic features (i.e., phonological vs. lexicogrammatical aspects of language) affect both native speaking (NS) and non-native speaking (NNS) listeners' perceptions of comprehensibility. In the experiment, seven NS and near-native NNS listeners rated the comprehensibility of two types of NNS extemporaneous speech samples: one was carefully transcribed by the researcher and read by NSs, while the other was an unaltered collection of speech tokens recorded by NNSs. The results demonstrated two possible patterns: (a) That NNS listeners tended to show high awareness towards phonological aspects of language rather than lexicogrammatical aspects of language; and (b) the comprehensibility ratings of NS listeners were equally influenced by all kinds of linguistic errors. These findings were carefully discussed in order to inform both theoretical argument and pedagogical inquiries in practice, establishing better understanding of second language acquisition processes.
KW - Comprehensibility
KW - Intelligibility
KW - Linguistic error analysis
KW - Pronunciation teaching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858845497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858845497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84858845497
VL - 8
SP - 39
EP - 61
JO - Journal of Asia TEFL
JF - Journal of Asia TEFL
SN - 1738-3102
IS - 1
ER -