抄録
We evaluated the effectiveness of a charette for reviving the collaborative planning process by two critetia. Criterion one is "How the charette worked for letting people to think another person's stance." and criterion two is "How the charette worked for reviving the collaborative decision-making process." We had the experimental charette with students, and found that it worked for understanding people's stance and collaborative decisionmaking process. It specially worked for compromising with other participants regarding conflict points.
| 元の言語 | English |
|---|---|
| ページ（範囲） | 903-908 |
| ページ数 | 6 |
| ジャーナル | AIJ Journal of Technology and Design |
| 巻 | 15 |
| 発行部数 | 31 |
| DOI | |
| 出版物ステータス | Published - 2009 10 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Building and Construction
- Architecture
これを引用
Effectiveness of a charrette for reviving collaborative planning process. / Uchida, Naomi; Satoh, Shigeru.
：: AIJ Journal of Technology and Design, 巻 15, 番号 31, 10.2009, p. 903-908.研究成果: Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of a charrette for reviving collaborative planning process
AU - Uchida, Naomi
AU - Satoh, Shigeru
PY - 2009/10
Y1 - 2009/10
N2 - We evaluated the effectiveness of a charette for reviving the collaborative planning process by two critetia. Criterion one is "How the charette worked for letting people to think another person's stance." and criterion two is "How the charette worked for reviving the collaborative decision-making process." We had the experimental charette with students, and found that it worked for understanding people's stance and collaborative decisionmaking process. It specially worked for compromising with other participants regarding conflict points.
AB - We evaluated the effectiveness of a charette for reviving the collaborative planning process by two critetia. Criterion one is "How the charette worked for letting people to think another person's stance." and criterion two is "How the charette worked for reviving the collaborative decision-making process." We had the experimental charette with students, and found that it worked for understanding people's stance and collaborative decisionmaking process. It specially worked for compromising with other participants regarding conflict points.
KW - Charrette for reviving the process
KW - Collaborative planning
KW - Community planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954592336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954592336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3130/aijt.15.903
DO - 10.3130/aijt.15.903
M3 - Article
VL - 15
SP - 903
EP - 908
JO - AIJ Journal of Technology and Design
JF - AIJ Journal of Technology and Design
SN - 1341-9463
IS - 31
ER -