# Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function

Ryuuichi Ando, Shinichi Iwamoto

研究成果: Article

8 引用 (Scopus)

### 抄録

Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.

元の言語 English 57-66 10 Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi) 108 4 Published - 1988 7

### Fingerprint

System stability
Runge Kutta methods
Potential energy
Differential equations
Trajectories

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

• Electrical and Electronic Engineering

### これを引用

Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function. / Ando, Ryuuichi; Iwamoto, Shinichi.

：: Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi), 巻 108, 番号 4, 07.1988, p. 57-66.

研究成果: Article

@article{5e76a221ed764b8f9a284f8854c8ba8b,
title = "Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function",
abstract = "Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.",
author = "Ryuuichi Ando and Shinichi Iwamoto",
year = "1988",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "57--66",
journal = "Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)",
issn = "0424-7760",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Highly reliable transient stability solution method using energy function

AU - Ando, Ryuuichi

AU - Iwamoto, Shinichi

PY - 1988/7

Y1 - 1988/7

N2 - Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.

AB - Power system stability is usually determined by solving nonlinear differential equations numerically, for instance, by the Runge Kutta method. P.D. Aylett applied the energy function method to the power system stability problem. This paper discusses the Kakimoto method and PEBS method (Potential Energy Boundary method) proposed by T. Athay. It is pointed out that overly optimistic solutions are obtained due to the presence of second swing and decelerating step-out. This paper proposes a new method to determine the stability limit. Kakimoto's method gives an incorrect solution when the solution trajectory does not reach the critical energy curve and his method also fails to give the stability limit curve on the phase plane. A disadvantage of Athay's method is that the stability limit curve is approximated by PEBS method. The method proposed gives a clearly defined stability limit curve.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024038324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024038324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0024038324

VL - 108

SP - 57

EP - 66

JO - Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)

JF - Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)

SN - 0424-7760

IS - 4

ER -