How do citizens in east asian democracies understand left and right?

研究成果: Article

11 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Both general publics and elites have long used labels of left and right as cues for political communication and vote choice in Western democracies. This study examines the utility of these spatial semantics as means of encapsulating major political cleavages in East Asian democracies. Through analysis of public opinion surveys, we investigate the influence of organizational affiliation; views on socio-economic, religious, and 'new politics' issues, as well as attitudes toward the political system, as anchors of public understanding of the left-right dimension in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan. Patterns found in these countries are compared with two 'Western' nations in the region, Australia and New Zealand. Results show that citizens' left-right positions in Japan and the Australasian countries are more clearly structured by well-defined cleavages, such as socio-economic issues and post-materialism, and that parties in these countries compete on the basis of clearer ideological profiles. In contrast, despite high rates of cognition of the left-right scale in South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan, left-right orientations are less firmly anchored in attitudes and policy preferences. These differences in publics' level of ideological conceptualization are likely related to party system development and democratic experience.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)33-55
ページ数23
ジャーナルJapanese Journal of Political Science
12
発行部数1
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2011 4
外部発表Yes

Fingerprint

Philippines
South Korea
Taiwan
Japan
post-materialism
democracy
citizen
political communication
party system
system development
political system
public opinion
economics
cognition
voter
New Zealand
elite
semantics
politics
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

これを引用

@article{23606b88c864474686bcf3e177cdf5b2,
title = "How do citizens in east asian democracies understand left and right?",
abstract = "Both general publics and elites have long used labels of left and right as cues for political communication and vote choice in Western democracies. This study examines the utility of these spatial semantics as means of encapsulating major political cleavages in East Asian democracies. Through analysis of public opinion surveys, we investigate the influence of organizational affiliation; views on socio-economic, religious, and 'new politics' issues, as well as attitudes toward the political system, as anchors of public understanding of the left-right dimension in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan. Patterns found in these countries are compared with two 'Western' nations in the region, Australia and New Zealand. Results show that citizens' left-right positions in Japan and the Australasian countries are more clearly structured by well-defined cleavages, such as socio-economic issues and post-materialism, and that parties in these countries compete on the basis of clearer ideological profiles. In contrast, despite high rates of cognition of the left-right scale in South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan, left-right orientations are less firmly anchored in attitudes and policy preferences. These differences in publics' level of ideological conceptualization are likely related to party system development and democratic experience.",
author = "Willy Jou",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S146810991000023X",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "33--55",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1468-1099",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do citizens in east asian democracies understand left and right?

AU - Jou, Willy

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Both general publics and elites have long used labels of left and right as cues for political communication and vote choice in Western democracies. This study examines the utility of these spatial semantics as means of encapsulating major political cleavages in East Asian democracies. Through analysis of public opinion surveys, we investigate the influence of organizational affiliation; views on socio-economic, religious, and 'new politics' issues, as well as attitudes toward the political system, as anchors of public understanding of the left-right dimension in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan. Patterns found in these countries are compared with two 'Western' nations in the region, Australia and New Zealand. Results show that citizens' left-right positions in Japan and the Australasian countries are more clearly structured by well-defined cleavages, such as socio-economic issues and post-materialism, and that parties in these countries compete on the basis of clearer ideological profiles. In contrast, despite high rates of cognition of the left-right scale in South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan, left-right orientations are less firmly anchored in attitudes and policy preferences. These differences in publics' level of ideological conceptualization are likely related to party system development and democratic experience.

AB - Both general publics and elites have long used labels of left and right as cues for political communication and vote choice in Western democracies. This study examines the utility of these spatial semantics as means of encapsulating major political cleavages in East Asian democracies. Through analysis of public opinion surveys, we investigate the influence of organizational affiliation; views on socio-economic, religious, and 'new politics' issues, as well as attitudes toward the political system, as anchors of public understanding of the left-right dimension in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan. Patterns found in these countries are compared with two 'Western' nations in the region, Australia and New Zealand. Results show that citizens' left-right positions in Japan and the Australasian countries are more clearly structured by well-defined cleavages, such as socio-economic issues and post-materialism, and that parties in these countries compete on the basis of clearer ideological profiles. In contrast, despite high rates of cognition of the left-right scale in South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan, left-right orientations are less firmly anchored in attitudes and policy preferences. These differences in publics' level of ideological conceptualization are likely related to party system development and democratic experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960733553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960733553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S146810991000023X

DO - 10.1017/S146810991000023X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960733553

VL - 12

SP - 33

EP - 55

JO - Japanese Journal of Political Science

JF - Japanese Journal of Political Science

SN - 1468-1099

IS - 1

ER -