Influence of removal of invisible fixation on the saccadic and manual gap effect

Hiroshi Ueda, Kohske Takahashi, Katsumi Watanabe

研究成果: Article

3 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Saccadic and manual reactions to a peripherally presented target are facilitated by removing a central fixation stimulus shortly before a target onset (the gap effect). The present study examined the effects of removal of a visible and invisible fixation point on the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. Participants were required to fixate a central fixation point and respond to a peripherally presented target as quickly and accurately as possible by making a saccade (Experiment 1) or pressing a corresponding key (Experiment 2). The fixation point was dichoptically presented, and visibility was manipulated by using binocular rivalry and continuous flash suppression technique. In both saccade and key-press tasks, removing the visible fixation strongly quickened the responses. Furthermore, the invisible fixation, which remained on the display but suppressed, significantly delayed the saccadic response. Contrarily, the invisible fixation had no effect on the manual task. These results indicate that partially different processes mediate the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. In particular, unconscious processes might modulate an oculomotor-specific component of the saccadic gap effect, presumably via subcortical mechanisms.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)329-336
ページ数8
ジャーナルExperimental Brain Research
232
発行部数1
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2014 1
外部発表Yes

Fingerprint

Saccades

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

これを引用

Influence of removal of invisible fixation on the saccadic and manual gap effect. / Ueda, Hiroshi; Takahashi, Kohske; Watanabe, Katsumi.

:: Experimental Brain Research, 巻 232, 番号 1, 01.2014, p. 329-336.

研究成果: Article

@article{cd145ef9d86d47e6a9335a3ecdb38ce3,
title = "Influence of removal of invisible fixation on the saccadic and manual gap effect",
abstract = "Saccadic and manual reactions to a peripherally presented target are facilitated by removing a central fixation stimulus shortly before a target onset (the gap effect). The present study examined the effects of removal of a visible and invisible fixation point on the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. Participants were required to fixate a central fixation point and respond to a peripherally presented target as quickly and accurately as possible by making a saccade (Experiment 1) or pressing a corresponding key (Experiment 2). The fixation point was dichoptically presented, and visibility was manipulated by using binocular rivalry and continuous flash suppression technique. In both saccade and key-press tasks, removing the visible fixation strongly quickened the responses. Furthermore, the invisible fixation, which remained on the display but suppressed, significantly delayed the saccadic response. Contrarily, the invisible fixation had no effect on the manual task. These results indicate that partially different processes mediate the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. In particular, unconscious processes might modulate an oculomotor-specific component of the saccadic gap effect, presumably via subcortical mechanisms.",
keywords = "Binocular rivalry, Continuous flash suppression, Gap effect, Manual reaction time, Saccade",
author = "Hiroshi Ueda and Kohske Takahashi and Katsumi Watanabe",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-013-3743-6",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
pages = "329--336",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of removal of invisible fixation on the saccadic and manual gap effect

AU - Ueda, Hiroshi

AU - Takahashi, Kohske

AU - Watanabe, Katsumi

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Saccadic and manual reactions to a peripherally presented target are facilitated by removing a central fixation stimulus shortly before a target onset (the gap effect). The present study examined the effects of removal of a visible and invisible fixation point on the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. Participants were required to fixate a central fixation point and respond to a peripherally presented target as quickly and accurately as possible by making a saccade (Experiment 1) or pressing a corresponding key (Experiment 2). The fixation point was dichoptically presented, and visibility was manipulated by using binocular rivalry and continuous flash suppression technique. In both saccade and key-press tasks, removing the visible fixation strongly quickened the responses. Furthermore, the invisible fixation, which remained on the display but suppressed, significantly delayed the saccadic response. Contrarily, the invisible fixation had no effect on the manual task. These results indicate that partially different processes mediate the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. In particular, unconscious processes might modulate an oculomotor-specific component of the saccadic gap effect, presumably via subcortical mechanisms.

AB - Saccadic and manual reactions to a peripherally presented target are facilitated by removing a central fixation stimulus shortly before a target onset (the gap effect). The present study examined the effects of removal of a visible and invisible fixation point on the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. Participants were required to fixate a central fixation point and respond to a peripherally presented target as quickly and accurately as possible by making a saccade (Experiment 1) or pressing a corresponding key (Experiment 2). The fixation point was dichoptically presented, and visibility was manipulated by using binocular rivalry and continuous flash suppression technique. In both saccade and key-press tasks, removing the visible fixation strongly quickened the responses. Furthermore, the invisible fixation, which remained on the display but suppressed, significantly delayed the saccadic response. Contrarily, the invisible fixation had no effect on the manual task. These results indicate that partially different processes mediate the saccadic gap effect and the manual gap effect. In particular, unconscious processes might modulate an oculomotor-specific component of the saccadic gap effect, presumably via subcortical mechanisms.

KW - Binocular rivalry

KW - Continuous flash suppression

KW - Gap effect

KW - Manual reaction time

KW - Saccade

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891845708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891845708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-013-3743-6

DO - 10.1007/s00221-013-3743-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 24162862

AN - SCOPUS:84891845708

VL - 232

SP - 329

EP - 336

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 1

ER -