TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the optimal load for maximal power output during hang power cleans submaximal?
AU - Takei, Seiichiro
AU - Hirayama, Kuniaki
AU - Okada, Junichi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the weight-lifting team members of Waseda University for their participation in the study. They also wish to acknowledge the help provided by Mr Yoshiki Morikawa, Mr Hisato Orai, and Ms Saaya Uchikado for their assistance with the data collection. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K01696 and Waseda University Grant for Special Research Projects (project number: 2017K-322). The results of the current study do not constitute endorsement of the product by the authors or the journal.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: The optimal load for maximal power output during hang power cleans (HPCs) from a mechanical perspective is the 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) load; however, previous research has reported otherwise. The present study thus aimed to investigate the underlying factors that determine optimal load during HPCs. Methods: Eight competitive Olympic weight lifters performed HPCs at 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of their 1RM while the ground-reaction force and bar/body kinematics were simultaneously recorded. The success criterion during HPC was set above parallel squat at the receiving position. Results: Both peak power and relative peak power were maximized at 80% 1RM (3975.7 [439.1] W, 50.4 [6.6] W/kg, respectively). Peak force, force at peak power, and relative values tended to increase with heavier loads (P < .001), while peak system velocity and system velocity at peak power decreased significantly above 80% 1RM (P = .005 and .011, respectively). There were also significant decreases in peak bar velocity (P < .001) and bar displacement (P < .001) toward heavier loads. There was a strong positive correlation between peak bar velocity and bar displacement in 7 of 8 subjects (r > .90, P < .01). The knee joint angle at the receiving position fell below the quarter-squat position above 70% 1RM. Conclusions: Submaximal loads were indeed optimal for maximal power output for HPC when the success criterion was set above the parallel-squat position. However, when the success criterion was defined as the quarter-squat position, the optimal load became the 1RM load.
AB - Purpose: The optimal load for maximal power output during hang power cleans (HPCs) from a mechanical perspective is the 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) load; however, previous research has reported otherwise. The present study thus aimed to investigate the underlying factors that determine optimal load during HPCs. Methods: Eight competitive Olympic weight lifters performed HPCs at 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% of their 1RM while the ground-reaction force and bar/body kinematics were simultaneously recorded. The success criterion during HPC was set above parallel squat at the receiving position. Results: Both peak power and relative peak power were maximized at 80% 1RM (3975.7 [439.1] W, 50.4 [6.6] W/kg, respectively). Peak force, force at peak power, and relative values tended to increase with heavier loads (P < .001), while peak system velocity and system velocity at peak power decreased significantly above 80% 1RM (P = .005 and .011, respectively). There were also significant decreases in peak bar velocity (P < .001) and bar displacement (P < .001) toward heavier loads. There was a strong positive correlation between peak bar velocity and bar displacement in 7 of 8 subjects (r > .90, P < .01). The knee joint angle at the receiving position fell below the quarter-squat position above 70% 1RM. Conclusions: Submaximal loads were indeed optimal for maximal power output for HPC when the success criterion was set above the parallel-squat position. However, when the success criterion was defined as the quarter-squat position, the optimal load became the 1RM load.
KW - 1-repetition maximum
KW - Olympic weight lifting
KW - Power training
KW - Squat position
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077655884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077655884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0894
DO - 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0894
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077655884
SN - 1555-0265
VL - 15
SP - 18
EP - 24
JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
IS - 1
ER -