Muppets and gazelles: Political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research

Paul Nightingale, Alex Coad*

*この研究の対応する著者

研究成果: Article査読

181 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Despite an almost universally accepted belief outside academia that entrepreneurial activity is a positive driving force in the economy, the accumulated evidence remains largely inconclusive. This article positions the increased interest in entrepreneurship since the 1980s within its historical context and highlights the significant methodological problems with its analysis. Taking these problems into account it reevaluates the performance of entrepreneurial firms in terms of innovation, job creation, economic growth, productivity growth, and happiness to show how both positive and negative interpretations can emerge. A pattern of increasingly positive interpretation is observed as one moves from analysis to policy. To address this bias, the article suggests the single category "entrepreneurial firms" be broken up along a continuum from the large number of economically marginal, undersized, poor performance enterprises to the small number of high performance "gazelles" that drive most positive impact on the economy. This would allow a more realistic evaluation of the impact of entrepreneurs by avoiding a composition fallacy that assigns the benefits of entrepreneurship to the average firm.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)113-143
ページ数31
ジャーナルIndustrial and Corporate Change
23
1
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2014 2月
外部発表はい

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 経済学、計量経済学

フィンガープリント

「Muppets and gazelles: Political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル