Parametric analysis of wellbore-strengthening methods from basic rock mechanics

Nobuo Morita, Giin Fa Fuh

研究成果: Article

36 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

The authors presented the first industry SPE paper on wellbore strengthening, which proposed a new concept for lost-circulation prevention while drilling (Morita et al. 1988; Fuh et al. 1992;Morita et al. 1996). Recently, the authors were invited to present at the 2010 SPE Forum held at Park City, Utah, USA. This presentation focused on wellbore-strengthening methods currently used in the industry, including well cooling, stress cage, and tip screening of induced fractures. During the forum, participants requested a parametric analysis of these methods using rock-mechanics equations and principles. This paper presents a set of analytical equations developed for parametric analysis of three typical wellbore-strengthening methods (Fuh et al. 2007; Alberty and McLean 2004) and provides information about the strengths and limitations of each method. In addition, an updated set of equations developed on the basis of previous work completed by the authors has been provided to make the analysis of wellbore-strengtheningmethods easier to implement. The equations can be classified by the length of the cracks to be stabilized, as follows: • Borehole strengthening by heating to stabilize 0.0- to 0.1-in. cracks. (Not included in this parametric study.) • Borehole strengthening to stabilize microcracks (with mudcake or fine particles) for 0.1- to 1-in. cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize macrocracks (stress-cage method) for 1-in. to 2-ft cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize a large fracture with the tip-screening method for cracks longer than 10 ft. Parametric studies were conducted on three wellbore-strengthening methods, and the following observations were made: • Borehole-stabilization method: Water-based mud mixed with 25/40-mesh particles stabilizes the borehole by plugging the microcracks with mudcake. Borehole stability is enhanced by mixing 25/40-mesh crushed nut shells into the mud. Some drilling engineers enhance borehole stability by intentionally returning a proper range of cutting particles from the shale shakers. • Stress-cage method: This method is applicable if the formation permeability is not too low. However, if the permeability is low, a high-fluid-loss pill is required to reduce propagation of the induced fracture and adequately place the granular materials. After wellbore strengthening, ultralow-fluid-loss mud is required during drilling to reduce the pressure buildup in the fracture section behind the seal. • Tip-screening method: This method does not require the squeezing of particles to induce a fracture. Mixing particles with drilling fluid prevents fracture initiation, and if a fracture is induced, this mixture prevents further fracture propagation by tip screening. Tip screening is effective if a lost-circulation zone has some permeability, but is less effective if the lost-circulation zone has no permeability. copyright

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)315-327
ページ数13
ジャーナルSPE Drilling and Completion
27
発行部数2
出版物ステータスPublished - 2012 6

Fingerprint

Rock mechanics
Boreholes
Screening
Cracks
Drilling
Microcracks
Fluids
Granular materials
Drilling fluids
Shale
Seals
Crack propagation
Industry
Stabilization
Cooling
Heating
Engineers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Mechanical Engineering

これを引用

Parametric analysis of wellbore-strengthening methods from basic rock mechanics. / Morita, Nobuo; Fuh, Giin Fa.

:: SPE Drilling and Completion, 巻 27, 番号 2, 06.2012, p. 315-327.

研究成果: Article

Morita, Nobuo ; Fuh, Giin Fa. / Parametric analysis of wellbore-strengthening methods from basic rock mechanics. :: SPE Drilling and Completion. 2012 ; 巻 27, 番号 2. pp. 315-327.
@article{9599259b330e4bc4b978707470963f9e,
title = "Parametric analysis of wellbore-strengthening methods from basic rock mechanics",
abstract = "The authors presented the first industry SPE paper on wellbore strengthening, which proposed a new concept for lost-circulation prevention while drilling (Morita et al. 1988; Fuh et al. 1992;Morita et al. 1996). Recently, the authors were invited to present at the 2010 SPE Forum held at Park City, Utah, USA. This presentation focused on wellbore-strengthening methods currently used in the industry, including well cooling, stress cage, and tip screening of induced fractures. During the forum, participants requested a parametric analysis of these methods using rock-mechanics equations and principles. This paper presents a set of analytical equations developed for parametric analysis of three typical wellbore-strengthening methods (Fuh et al. 2007; Alberty and McLean 2004) and provides information about the strengths and limitations of each method. In addition, an updated set of equations developed on the basis of previous work completed by the authors has been provided to make the analysis of wellbore-strengtheningmethods easier to implement. The equations can be classified by the length of the cracks to be stabilized, as follows: • Borehole strengthening by heating to stabilize 0.0- to 0.1-in. cracks. (Not included in this parametric study.) • Borehole strengthening to stabilize microcracks (with mudcake or fine particles) for 0.1- to 1-in. cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize macrocracks (stress-cage method) for 1-in. to 2-ft cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize a large fracture with the tip-screening method for cracks longer than 10 ft. Parametric studies were conducted on three wellbore-strengthening methods, and the following observations were made: • Borehole-stabilization method: Water-based mud mixed with 25/40-mesh particles stabilizes the borehole by plugging the microcracks with mudcake. Borehole stability is enhanced by mixing 25/40-mesh crushed nut shells into the mud. Some drilling engineers enhance borehole stability by intentionally returning a proper range of cutting particles from the shale shakers. • Stress-cage method: This method is applicable if the formation permeability is not too low. However, if the permeability is low, a high-fluid-loss pill is required to reduce propagation of the induced fracture and adequately place the granular materials. After wellbore strengthening, ultralow-fluid-loss mud is required during drilling to reduce the pressure buildup in the fracture section behind the seal. • Tip-screening method: This method does not require the squeezing of particles to induce a fracture. Mixing particles with drilling fluid prevents fracture initiation, and if a fracture is induced, this mixture prevents further fracture propagation by tip screening. Tip screening is effective if a lost-circulation zone has some permeability, but is less effective if the lost-circulation zone has no permeability. copyright",
author = "Nobuo Morita and Fuh, {Giin Fa}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "315--327",
journal = "SPE Drilling and Completion",
issn = "1064-6671",
publisher = "Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parametric analysis of wellbore-strengthening methods from basic rock mechanics

AU - Morita, Nobuo

AU - Fuh, Giin Fa

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - The authors presented the first industry SPE paper on wellbore strengthening, which proposed a new concept for lost-circulation prevention while drilling (Morita et al. 1988; Fuh et al. 1992;Morita et al. 1996). Recently, the authors were invited to present at the 2010 SPE Forum held at Park City, Utah, USA. This presentation focused on wellbore-strengthening methods currently used in the industry, including well cooling, stress cage, and tip screening of induced fractures. During the forum, participants requested a parametric analysis of these methods using rock-mechanics equations and principles. This paper presents a set of analytical equations developed for parametric analysis of three typical wellbore-strengthening methods (Fuh et al. 2007; Alberty and McLean 2004) and provides information about the strengths and limitations of each method. In addition, an updated set of equations developed on the basis of previous work completed by the authors has been provided to make the analysis of wellbore-strengtheningmethods easier to implement. The equations can be classified by the length of the cracks to be stabilized, as follows: • Borehole strengthening by heating to stabilize 0.0- to 0.1-in. cracks. (Not included in this parametric study.) • Borehole strengthening to stabilize microcracks (with mudcake or fine particles) for 0.1- to 1-in. cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize macrocracks (stress-cage method) for 1-in. to 2-ft cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize a large fracture with the tip-screening method for cracks longer than 10 ft. Parametric studies were conducted on three wellbore-strengthening methods, and the following observations were made: • Borehole-stabilization method: Water-based mud mixed with 25/40-mesh particles stabilizes the borehole by plugging the microcracks with mudcake. Borehole stability is enhanced by mixing 25/40-mesh crushed nut shells into the mud. Some drilling engineers enhance borehole stability by intentionally returning a proper range of cutting particles from the shale shakers. • Stress-cage method: This method is applicable if the formation permeability is not too low. However, if the permeability is low, a high-fluid-loss pill is required to reduce propagation of the induced fracture and adequately place the granular materials. After wellbore strengthening, ultralow-fluid-loss mud is required during drilling to reduce the pressure buildup in the fracture section behind the seal. • Tip-screening method: This method does not require the squeezing of particles to induce a fracture. Mixing particles with drilling fluid prevents fracture initiation, and if a fracture is induced, this mixture prevents further fracture propagation by tip screening. Tip screening is effective if a lost-circulation zone has some permeability, but is less effective if the lost-circulation zone has no permeability. copyright

AB - The authors presented the first industry SPE paper on wellbore strengthening, which proposed a new concept for lost-circulation prevention while drilling (Morita et al. 1988; Fuh et al. 1992;Morita et al. 1996). Recently, the authors were invited to present at the 2010 SPE Forum held at Park City, Utah, USA. This presentation focused on wellbore-strengthening methods currently used in the industry, including well cooling, stress cage, and tip screening of induced fractures. During the forum, participants requested a parametric analysis of these methods using rock-mechanics equations and principles. This paper presents a set of analytical equations developed for parametric analysis of three typical wellbore-strengthening methods (Fuh et al. 2007; Alberty and McLean 2004) and provides information about the strengths and limitations of each method. In addition, an updated set of equations developed on the basis of previous work completed by the authors has been provided to make the analysis of wellbore-strengtheningmethods easier to implement. The equations can be classified by the length of the cracks to be stabilized, as follows: • Borehole strengthening by heating to stabilize 0.0- to 0.1-in. cracks. (Not included in this parametric study.) • Borehole strengthening to stabilize microcracks (with mudcake or fine particles) for 0.1- to 1-in. cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize macrocracks (stress-cage method) for 1-in. to 2-ft cracks. • Borehole strengthening to stabilize a large fracture with the tip-screening method for cracks longer than 10 ft. Parametric studies were conducted on three wellbore-strengthening methods, and the following observations were made: • Borehole-stabilization method: Water-based mud mixed with 25/40-mesh particles stabilizes the borehole by plugging the microcracks with mudcake. Borehole stability is enhanced by mixing 25/40-mesh crushed nut shells into the mud. Some drilling engineers enhance borehole stability by intentionally returning a proper range of cutting particles from the shale shakers. • Stress-cage method: This method is applicable if the formation permeability is not too low. However, if the permeability is low, a high-fluid-loss pill is required to reduce propagation of the induced fracture and adequately place the granular materials. After wellbore strengthening, ultralow-fluid-loss mud is required during drilling to reduce the pressure buildup in the fracture section behind the seal. • Tip-screening method: This method does not require the squeezing of particles to induce a fracture. Mixing particles with drilling fluid prevents fracture initiation, and if a fracture is induced, this mixture prevents further fracture propagation by tip screening. Tip screening is effective if a lost-circulation zone has some permeability, but is less effective if the lost-circulation zone has no permeability. copyright

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862666111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862666111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862666111

VL - 27

SP - 315

EP - 327

JO - SPE Drilling and Completion

JF - SPE Drilling and Completion

SN - 1064-6671

IS - 2

ER -