Pro- and anti-whaling discourses in British and Japanese newspaper reports in comparison: A cross-cultural perspective

Kumiko Murata

    研究成果: Article

    18 被引用数 (Scopus)

    抄録

    This article compares and contrasts the discourse of whaling in British and Japanese newspaper reports. It investigates the ways in which pro- and anti-whaling discourses are formulated in the press by examining, in particular, the following features: (1) the use of specific lexis and syntactic structures, (2) the use of rhetorical devices, and (3) the control and organization of information at a discourse level. The article claims that British and Japanese news reports use very different strategies in expressing their anti- and pro-whaling stances; the former tend to use a more emotive and provocative tone, whereas the latter use a more restrained and factual tone. The article also claims that the issue of whaling tends to be discussed under different cultural assumptions and values in the respective discourses; and thus, suggests the possibility that readers may be influenced by the cumulative effects of these different discourses.

    本文言語English
    ページ(範囲)741-764
    ページ数24
    ジャーナルDiscourse and Society
    18
    6
    DOI
    出版ステータスPublished - 2007 11

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Communication
    • Sociology and Political Science

    フィンガープリント 「Pro- and anti-whaling discourses in British and Japanese newspaper reports in comparison: A cross-cultural perspective」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

    引用スタイル