Protest, counter-protest and organizational diversification of protest groups

Kana Inata*

*この研究の対応する著者

研究成果: Article査読

2 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Whereas protests have been discussed predominantly in terms of collective action issues, achieving coordination does not always guarantee success. Protest groups must also back their demands with sufficient threats. Some assert that threats are enhanced by the mobilization of more resources. Yet this conventional wisdom fails to explain why not all large-scale protests win government concessions or why some protest groups spend resources on their organizational infrastructure even though it will not inflict immediate damage on the government. Formalizing protest in a bargaining model, I show that investing in organizational infrastructure improves the impact of protest groups’ threats by lowering the probability that a counter-protest will offset the impact of the original protest.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)434-456
ページ数23
ジャーナルConflict Management and Peace Science
38
4
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2021 7月

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 経済学、計量経済学
  • 政治学と国際関係論

フィンガープリント

「Protest, counter-protest and organizational diversification of protest groups」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル