R&D in clean technology: A project choice model with learning

Koki Oikawa, Shunsuke Managi

研究成果: Article

2 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

In this study, we investigate the qualitative and quantitative effects of an R&D subsidy for a clean technology and a Pigouvian tax on a dirty technology on environmental R&D when it is uncertain how long the research takes to complete. The model is formulated as an optimal stopping problem, in which the number of successes required to complete the R&D project is finite and learning about the probability of success is incorporated. We show that the optimal R&D subsidy with the consideration of learning is higher than that without it. We also find that an R&D subsidy performs better than a Pigouvian tax unless suppliers have sufficient incentives to continue cost-reduction efforts after the new technology successfully replaces the old one. Moreover, by using a two-project model, we show that a uniform subsidy is better than a selective subsidy.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)175-195
ページ数21
ジャーナルJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
117
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2015 9 1

Fingerprint

Subsidies
Clean technology
Choice models
Pigouvian tax
Suppliers
Incentives
Optimal stopping problem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Economics and Econometrics

これを引用

R&D in clean technology : A project choice model with learning. / Oikawa, Koki; Managi, Shunsuke.

:: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 巻 117, 01.09.2015, p. 175-195.

研究成果: Article

@article{1508e49709db4418a30085b2e94bac5f,
title = "R&D in clean technology: A project choice model with learning",
abstract = "In this study, we investigate the qualitative and quantitative effects of an R&D subsidy for a clean technology and a Pigouvian tax on a dirty technology on environmental R&D when it is uncertain how long the research takes to complete. The model is formulated as an optimal stopping problem, in which the number of successes required to complete the R&D project is finite and learning about the probability of success is incorporated. We show that the optimal R&D subsidy with the consideration of learning is higher than that without it. We also find that an R&D subsidy performs better than a Pigouvian tax unless suppliers have sufficient incentives to continue cost-reduction efforts after the new technology successfully replaces the old one. Moreover, by using a two-project model, we show that a uniform subsidy is better than a selective subsidy.",
keywords = "Environmental technology, Learning, Pigouvian tax, R&D subsidy",
author = "Koki Oikawa and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.015",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "175--195",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - R&D in clean technology

T2 - A project choice model with learning

AU - Oikawa, Koki

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - In this study, we investigate the qualitative and quantitative effects of an R&D subsidy for a clean technology and a Pigouvian tax on a dirty technology on environmental R&D when it is uncertain how long the research takes to complete. The model is formulated as an optimal stopping problem, in which the number of successes required to complete the R&D project is finite and learning about the probability of success is incorporated. We show that the optimal R&D subsidy with the consideration of learning is higher than that without it. We also find that an R&D subsidy performs better than a Pigouvian tax unless suppliers have sufficient incentives to continue cost-reduction efforts after the new technology successfully replaces the old one. Moreover, by using a two-project model, we show that a uniform subsidy is better than a selective subsidy.

AB - In this study, we investigate the qualitative and quantitative effects of an R&D subsidy for a clean technology and a Pigouvian tax on a dirty technology on environmental R&D when it is uncertain how long the research takes to complete. The model is formulated as an optimal stopping problem, in which the number of successes required to complete the R&D project is finite and learning about the probability of success is incorporated. We show that the optimal R&D subsidy with the consideration of learning is higher than that without it. We also find that an R&D subsidy performs better than a Pigouvian tax unless suppliers have sufficient incentives to continue cost-reduction efforts after the new technology successfully replaces the old one. Moreover, by using a two-project model, we show that a uniform subsidy is better than a selective subsidy.

KW - Environmental technology

KW - Learning

KW - Pigouvian tax

KW - R&D subsidy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936944964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936944964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84936944964

VL - 117

SP - 175

EP - 195

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

SN - 0167-2681

ER -