厳罰傾向と帰属スタイルの関連 日韓の比較から

Tomoya Mukai*, Yuma Matsuki, Mariko Kimura, Fumiya Kondo

*この研究の対応する著者

研究成果: Article査読

抄録

This study aims to explore how the relationship between punitiveness and attributional style differs between Japan and Korea. Data from 330 Japanese and 339 Koreans were analyzed. Multi-group structural equation modeling showed that in both Japan and Korea, punitiveness consisted of three factors (support for harsher punishment, greater criminalization, and use of the death penalty) while the attributional style consisted of two factors (dispositional attribution and situational attribution). In both countries, dispositional attribution was related to punitiveness. Regarding differences, the scores for punitiveness on all three subscale scores and for dispositional attribution were higher in Korea whereas the negative relationship between punitiveness subscale scores and situational attribution was stronger in Japan. This suggests that Japanese are less likely to support punitive measures for criminals and to attribute the causes of crime to the criminals themselves than Koreans. In addition, when deciding on the severity of punishment, Japanese are more likely to take situational causes into consideration.

寄稿の翻訳タイトルRelationship between punitiveness and attributional styles: A comparison between japan and korea
本文言語Japanese
ページ(範囲)183-192
ページ数10
ジャーナルShinrigaku Kenkyu
91
3
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Attributional styles
  • Comparison study
  • Punitiveness
  • Support for death penalty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 心理学(全般)

フィンガープリント

「厳罰傾向と帰属スタイルの関連 日韓の比較から」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル