Sensation fiction and the publishing industry

研究成果: Chapter

1 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

In considering the perils to which our language is exposed, the constant influence of corruption from colonial sources must not be overlooked … There seems … to be an unhealthy passion for adoption on the part of the public. Two or three years ago nobody would have known what was meant by a Sensation Novel; yet now the term has already passed through the stage of jocular use … and has been adopted as the regular commercial name for a particular product of industry for which there is just now a brisk demand. A commercial atmosphere floats around works of this class, redolent of the manufactory and the shop. The public want novels, and novels must be made – so many yards of printed stuff, sensation-pattern, to be ready by the beginning of the season … Various causes have been at work to produce this phenomenon of our literature. Three principal ones may be named as having had a large share in it – periodicals, circulating libraries, and railway bookstalls. The two quotations above are both taken from unsigned articles in prestigious intellectual quarterly magazines, which, despite their different ideological platforms, were united in the mid 1860s in mounting a reactionary critical assault on the fiction of sensation. The first, from the Edinburgh Review with its pronounced Whig tendencies, was merely a passing gibe in the course of a denunciation of current abuses of the English language penned by the barrister Matthew Brickdale, who nevertheless implied that the enjoyment of sensation fiction itself should be treated as an ‘unhealthy passion’. The second appeared in the Tory Quarterly Review and was by Henry Mansel, then a Cambridge don and shortly to be appointed Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral; though formally a review of two dozen novels, including works by Braddon, Collins and Wood, it in fact constituted a broadside attack on the febrile, ephemeral nature of sensation fiction. Both centre on provocative comments on developments in the mid-Victorian publishing industry, which are nevertheless prone to distortion on account of the elitist ideological position each periodical espoused.

元の言語English
ホスト出版物のタイトルThe Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction
出版者Cambridge University Press
ページ168-181
ページ数14
ISBN(印刷物)9780511675744, 9780521760744
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2011 1 1

Fingerprint

Fiction
Industry
Novel
Passion
Wood
Corruption
Broadsides
Elitist
Language
Enjoyment
Perils
Railway
Regular
Attack
Tory
Victorian Era
Barristers
Atmosphere
Names
Abuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

これを引用

Law, G. (2011). Sensation fiction and the publishing industry. : The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction (pp. 168-181). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511675744.014

Sensation fiction and the publishing industry. / Law, Graham.

The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 168-181.

研究成果: Chapter

Law, G 2011, Sensation fiction and the publishing industry. : The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction. Cambridge University Press, pp. 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511675744.014
Law G. Sensation fiction and the publishing industry. : The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 168-181 https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511675744.014
Law, Graham. / Sensation fiction and the publishing industry. The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 168-181
@inbook{29f4146e912345a8bafb265a1624f775,
title = "Sensation fiction and the publishing industry",
abstract = "In considering the perils to which our language is exposed, the constant influence of corruption from colonial sources must not be overlooked … There seems … to be an unhealthy passion for adoption on the part of the public. Two or three years ago nobody would have known what was meant by a Sensation Novel; yet now the term has already passed through the stage of jocular use … and has been adopted as the regular commercial name for a particular product of industry for which there is just now a brisk demand. A commercial atmosphere floats around works of this class, redolent of the manufactory and the shop. The public want novels, and novels must be made – so many yards of printed stuff, sensation-pattern, to be ready by the beginning of the season … Various causes have been at work to produce this phenomenon of our literature. Three principal ones may be named as having had a large share in it – periodicals, circulating libraries, and railway bookstalls. The two quotations above are both taken from unsigned articles in prestigious intellectual quarterly magazines, which, despite their different ideological platforms, were united in the mid 1860s in mounting a reactionary critical assault on the fiction of sensation. The first, from the Edinburgh Review with its pronounced Whig tendencies, was merely a passing gibe in the course of a denunciation of current abuses of the English language penned by the barrister Matthew Brickdale, who nevertheless implied that the enjoyment of sensation fiction itself should be treated as an ‘unhealthy passion’. The second appeared in the Tory Quarterly Review and was by Henry Mansel, then a Cambridge don and shortly to be appointed Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral; though formally a review of two dozen novels, including works by Braddon, Collins and Wood, it in fact constituted a broadside attack on the febrile, ephemeral nature of sensation fiction. Both centre on provocative comments on developments in the mid-Victorian publishing industry, which are nevertheless prone to distortion on account of the elitist ideological position each periodical espoused.",
author = "Graham Law",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CCO9780511675744.014",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780511675744",
pages = "168--181",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sensation fiction and the publishing industry

AU - Law, Graham

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - In considering the perils to which our language is exposed, the constant influence of corruption from colonial sources must not be overlooked … There seems … to be an unhealthy passion for adoption on the part of the public. Two or three years ago nobody would have known what was meant by a Sensation Novel; yet now the term has already passed through the stage of jocular use … and has been adopted as the regular commercial name for a particular product of industry for which there is just now a brisk demand. A commercial atmosphere floats around works of this class, redolent of the manufactory and the shop. The public want novels, and novels must be made – so many yards of printed stuff, sensation-pattern, to be ready by the beginning of the season … Various causes have been at work to produce this phenomenon of our literature. Three principal ones may be named as having had a large share in it – periodicals, circulating libraries, and railway bookstalls. The two quotations above are both taken from unsigned articles in prestigious intellectual quarterly magazines, which, despite their different ideological platforms, were united in the mid 1860s in mounting a reactionary critical assault on the fiction of sensation. The first, from the Edinburgh Review with its pronounced Whig tendencies, was merely a passing gibe in the course of a denunciation of current abuses of the English language penned by the barrister Matthew Brickdale, who nevertheless implied that the enjoyment of sensation fiction itself should be treated as an ‘unhealthy passion’. The second appeared in the Tory Quarterly Review and was by Henry Mansel, then a Cambridge don and shortly to be appointed Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral; though formally a review of two dozen novels, including works by Braddon, Collins and Wood, it in fact constituted a broadside attack on the febrile, ephemeral nature of sensation fiction. Both centre on provocative comments on developments in the mid-Victorian publishing industry, which are nevertheless prone to distortion on account of the elitist ideological position each periodical espoused.

AB - In considering the perils to which our language is exposed, the constant influence of corruption from colonial sources must not be overlooked … There seems … to be an unhealthy passion for adoption on the part of the public. Two or three years ago nobody would have known what was meant by a Sensation Novel; yet now the term has already passed through the stage of jocular use … and has been adopted as the regular commercial name for a particular product of industry for which there is just now a brisk demand. A commercial atmosphere floats around works of this class, redolent of the manufactory and the shop. The public want novels, and novels must be made – so many yards of printed stuff, sensation-pattern, to be ready by the beginning of the season … Various causes have been at work to produce this phenomenon of our literature. Three principal ones may be named as having had a large share in it – periodicals, circulating libraries, and railway bookstalls. The two quotations above are both taken from unsigned articles in prestigious intellectual quarterly magazines, which, despite their different ideological platforms, were united in the mid 1860s in mounting a reactionary critical assault on the fiction of sensation. The first, from the Edinburgh Review with its pronounced Whig tendencies, was merely a passing gibe in the course of a denunciation of current abuses of the English language penned by the barrister Matthew Brickdale, who nevertheless implied that the enjoyment of sensation fiction itself should be treated as an ‘unhealthy passion’. The second appeared in the Tory Quarterly Review and was by Henry Mansel, then a Cambridge don and shortly to be appointed Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral; though formally a review of two dozen novels, including works by Braddon, Collins and Wood, it in fact constituted a broadside attack on the febrile, ephemeral nature of sensation fiction. Both centre on provocative comments on developments in the mid-Victorian publishing industry, which are nevertheless prone to distortion on account of the elitist ideological position each periodical espoused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923518281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923518281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CCO9780511675744.014

DO - 10.1017/CCO9780511675744.014

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511675744

SN - 9780521760744

SP - 168

EP - 181

BT - The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -