The genesis and end of institutional fragmentation in global governance on climate change from a constructivist perspective

Chaewoon Oh*, Shunji Matsuoka

*この研究の対応する著者

研究成果: Article査読

3 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Global governance on climate change experienced institutional fragmentation by the generation of a competing institution, the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP), in 2005, outside the previously dominant institutions of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. Why was a competing institution created beside the extant dominant institutions in a singular international issue area? This puzzling question on the genesis of institutional fragmentation has been theoretically explored through international relation theories. However, a full-fledged answer has not come yet. This paper explains the genesis of institutional fragmentation on the theoretical grounds of constructivism’s normative contestation for strategic social construction. Results show that the APP was created by a norm entrepreneur as an organizational platform to embody normative contestation and diffuse the competing normative interpretations of climate change norms.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)143-159
ページ数17
ジャーナルInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
17
2
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2017 4 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 経済学、計量経済学
  • 政治学と国際関係論
  • 法学

フィンガープリント

「The genesis and end of institutional fragmentation in global governance on climate change from a constructivist perspective」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル