The study of international relations in Japan: Towards a more international discipline

Takashi Inoguchi, Paul Martyn Bacon

研究成果: Article査読

29 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

We deploy Waever's sociology of science approach in a critical comparison of the American and Japanese international relations academies. We argue that there are four great debates in the American academy, and four traditions of scholarship in the Japanese academy. We describe these debates and traditions in some detail, and identify and explain points of contact and difference between the two respective academies. We conclude by making a general case for methodological pluralism and offer reasons why the Japanese international relations academy is keen to sponsor a journal which is, in the words of Waever, able to 'draw on national traditions while keeping up with American developments'.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)1-20
ページ数20
ジャーナルInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific
1
1
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2001 1 1
外部発表はい

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Political Science and International Relations

フィンガープリント 「The study of international relations in Japan: Towards a more international discipline」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル