抄録
We deploy Waever's sociology of science approach in a critical comparison of the American and Japanese international relations academies. We argue that there are four great debates in the American academy, and four traditions of scholarship in the Japanese academy. We describe these debates and traditions in some detail, and identify and explain points of contact and difference between the two respective academies. We conclude by making a general case for methodological pluralism and offer reasons why the Japanese international relations academy is keen to sponsor a journal which is, in the words of Waever, able to 'draw on national traditions while keeping up with American developments'.
本文言語 | English |
---|---|
ページ(範囲) | 1-20 |
ページ数 | 20 |
ジャーナル | International Relations of the Asia-Pacific |
巻 | 1 |
号 | 1 |
DOI | |
出版ステータス | Published - 2001 1月 1 |
外部発表 | はい |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- 社会学および政治科学
- 経済学、計量経済学および金融学(全般)
- 政治学と国際関係論