To Denounce, or Not To Denounce: Survey Experiments on Diplomatic Quarrels

Shoko Kohama, Kazunori Inamasu, Atsushi Tago*

*この研究の対応する著者

研究成果: Article査読

5 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Despite widespread concern over heated diplomatic debates and growing interest in public diplomacy, it is still incompletely understood what type of message is more effective for gaining support from foreign public, or the international society, in situations where disputing countries compete in diplomatic campaigns. This study, through multiple survey experiments, uncovers the effect of being silent, issuing positive justification, and negative accusation, in interaction with the opponent’s strategy. We demonstrate that negative verbal attacks “work” and undermine the target’s popularity as they do in electoral campaigns. Unlike domestic electoral campaigns, however, negative diplomacy has little “backlash” and persuades people to support the attacker. Consequently, mutual verbal fights make neither party more popular than the other. Nevertheless, this does not discourage disputants from waging verbal fights due to the structure similar to the one-shot prisoner’s dilemma. We also find that positive messages are highly context-dependent—that is, their effects greatly depend on the opponent’s strategy and value proximity between the messenger and the receiver.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)243-260
ページ数18
ジャーナルPolitical Communication
34
2
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2017 4 3
外部発表はい

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 通信
  • 社会学および政治科学

フィンガープリント

「To Denounce, or Not To Denounce: Survey Experiments on Diplomatic Quarrels」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル